2 comments on “Digging beneath the racetrack surface debate

  1. Your analysis makes little to no sense. For you don’t even speculate as to what the numbers would be if you took the Woodbine, Keeneland or Del Mar horse flesh and raced it over the dirt course at Ruidoso Downs. That is to say that nothing in your observations accounts for the quality OF the horses who are supposedly dying, and the fact that only the better tracks, with higher quality runners, can even afford synthetic surfaces. Yet you’re sure happy to include the pig tracks with the pig runners in your summation of fatalities on dirt surfaces. Now wake up, will you?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s